Judge Judy, a popular daytime television series, has been a subject of speculation for decades. The 26-year-old actress, born Judith Susan Sheindlin, is known for her quick wit and sharp tongue, but she also has a tattoo with the initials “JY” inside. She has said that the tattoo is a reminder of her love for her husband, Jerry, who died in 2008. Sheindlin’s likeness has been replicated by artists, who have inked her portrait on fans worldwide.
Judge Judy’s tattoos have become a symbol of her love for her husband, Jerry, who passed away in 2008. Sheindlin’s tattoos have been both realistic and highly stylized, with some artists replicating her portraits on fans worldwide. She recently showed off her glowing tan from a recent getaway in the Bahamas for her 80th birthday.
Despite being a popular show, there have always been questions about whether Judge Judy is real. The 26-year-old offers a glimpse into the next generation of the Sheindlin legacy as the Judy Justice Law Clerk. She also has a tattoo of a Mindflayer from Dungeons and Dragons on her hand, which is known for devouring brains.
In today’s episode, it’s all about collaboration and reconnecting with old friends. The girls go to get tattooed, making questionable life decisions together.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| This “Jugz Judy” tattoo is not my best work, but it’s also … | This “Jugz Judy” tattoo is not my best work, but it’s also not my worst! Congrats (or condolences) to @jeffreyoabbott for winning round two of my shitty tattoo … | instagram.com |
| Judge Judy – 13-year-old girl drove to get a tattoo?! | This is old – wonder where little miss attitude is now and how that tattoo looks? 4 mos. 73. | m.facebook.com |
| “Judge Judy” Botched Tattooed Eyebrows?! (TV … – IMDb | Botched Tattooed Eyebrows?!: With Judy Sheindlin, Petri Hawkins Byrd. A woman sues for damages after her microblading treatment allegedly goes awry. | imdb.com |
📹 Friend’s Mom Signed Off on Tattoo for Teen! Part 1
Crissy’s mom wouldn’t let her get a tattoo and navel ring — so she asked her friend’s mom to sign off on it! The Original! There’s …
Why Did Judge Judy'S Husband Divorce Her?
Judy Sheindlin, known as Judge Judy, divorced her first husband, attorney Ronald Levy, in 1976 after 12 years of marriage. In 1978, she wed Judge Jerry Sheindlin, who later gained fame as an arbitrator on The People's Court from 1999 to 2001. The couple divorced in 1990, which Judy attributed to the emotional toll following her father Murray Blum's death that year. In a rare interview, the 81-year-old TV judge expressed that her initial reason for separating from Levy stemmed from his lack of support for her career.
Judy revealed that after 14 years of marriage, she felt unsupported by Jerry, particularly during her grieving period. Their communication broke down following a threatening discussion about divorce, which led to Judy filing the papers the next day. The couple separated for a year, during which Judy admitted she missed Jerry significantly. Eventually, they reconciled and remarried, suggesting a deep connection despite their challenges.
Judy's earlier marriage to Levy produced two children, Jamie and Adam, and she noted that marrying him felt like the "right" choice at the time, given societal expectations. Throughout their 48-year relationship, including their brief separation, the Sheindlins have managed to maintain their bond, navigating the complexities of love, loss, and professional ambitions. The couple’s journey illustrates the resilience of their partnership, with Judy candidly discussing the impact of personal hardships on their marriage and the importance of support in sustaining their relationship. Despite the ups and downs, the couple has successfully kept the spark alive in their marriage, showcasing a story of enduring love amid adversity.
Is Judge Judy A Legal Judgment?
On the set of "Judge Judy," Judith Sheindlin operates as an arbitrator rather than a traditional judge, issuing decisions that, while legally binding, are not formal legal judgments. The authority of her decisions stems from a contract the participating litigants have agreed to, obligating them to respect the rulings made during the show. This format represents a form of arbitration, which serves as an alternative to litigation typically conducted in a court, where parties may have the option to appeal decisions. In the case of Judge Judy, however, appeals are uncommon.
Her rise to television arbitration followed the departure of Joseph Wapner from "The People's Court" in May 1993. After Wapner's exit, Sheindlin reached out to the show's producers with the hope of taking over. Initially met with skepticism by a receptionist, her determination eventually led to her own distinct program. The show not only showcases real disputes but also settles them through arbitration, which has distinct rules from a courtroom.
While the judgments are usually final, the financial responsibilities tied to the decisions can be complex. If a plaintiff wins, Judge Judy's show covers the monetary judgment, rather than the defendant.
Over the decades, "Judge Judy" has become a platform for Americans to resolve conflicts outside of traditional courtroom settings. Despite its entertaining nature, the show's premise raises questions about the pursuit of true justice in a televised environment. Sheindlin presents a vision of the authoritative judge, drawing from both legal knowledge and intuitive insights in her decision-making process.
Though Judge Judy was indeed a judge in the past, her role on the program is that of an arbitrator, rooted in alternative dispute resolution methods. The court-like appearance of the set is misleading, as it does not fall under any formal judicial jurisdiction. The success of the show stems not just from the legitimacy of the cases presented but also from its engaging format and Sheindlin's dynamic personality.
In summary, "Judge Judy" operates within the framework of arbitration rather than conventional court proceedings, utilizing real cases and offering binding decisions. Sheindlin's past as a judge adds credibility, but ultimately, the program serves as both entertainment and a unique mechanism for conflict resolution in American society.
What Do You Get Paid To Be On Judge Judy?
The appearance fees for litigants on the show "Judge Judy" vary significantly, with some reporting amounts of $500, while others have received $100 or $250. Beyond these appearance fees, some litigants also receive an additional $35 daily stipend during their time on the show. The varying amounts of compensation likely depend on factors such as the individual's screen time or other undisclosed criteria. For those who win their case, the show's producers cover the monetary judgment from a designated fund, with the cap set at $5, 000.
Surprisingly, "Judge Judy," a show centered around everyday disputes, achieved immense popularity despite its seemingly mundane premise. At its peak, Judge Judy was earning around $60 million annually, signifying the show's success. While Judge Judy herself reportedly earns around $900, 000 per episode, the various scales of compensation for litigants illustrate a different financial reality for those appearing on the show.
Courtroom shows, including "Judge Judy," operate similarly to small claims courts, meaning awards are limited to $5, 000. The production company is responsible for paying these awards directly to the winners, distinguishing it from traditional court procedures where either the plaintiff or defendant is generally tasked with paying the judgment.
It is worth noting that Judge Judy functions more as a mediator than an actual judge. Once a decision is rendered, the show handles payment of the judgment, drawing from its resources. The litigants involved receive their appearance fees alongside focused stipends that may relate to the amount they're attempting to claim in their lawsuits.
Both sides, if they agree to participate, are compensated for their time on the show, which includes not just the appearance fees but also coverage of travel expenses such as airfare, hotel accommodations, and meal costs during production. This holistic coverage ensures that litigants are financially supported while attending the show's taping.
To participate in "Judge Judy," individuals interested in presenting their cases can apply via the official website, where personal details are submitted for consideration.
In summary, "Judge Judy" incorporates a multi-tiered compensation structure for litigants, blending appearance fees with daily stipends and covering incidental expenses, while also ensuring that any awarded judgments are managed directly by the show. Ultimately, the show’s operational model not only entertains but also compensates parties involved in the disputes portrayed.
Do Celebrities Rely On Judge Judy'S Brand Of Justice?
Judge Judy, hosted by former family court judge Judith Sheindlin, has become a significant figure in the realm of reality courtroom shows, appealing to both celebrities and the general public. An example of a celebrity engaging with Judge Judy's form of justice includes actress Roz Kelly, known for her role as Pinky Tuscadero on "Happy Days," who appeared in 1996 to sue her plastic surgeon over a faulty breast implant affecting her career.
Judge Judy, recognized for her no-nonsense, often blunt demeanor, has made her mark over more than two decades in the justice system, famously stating, "I can’t stand stupid, and I can’t stand slow."
In the landscape of courtroom television, shows like "People’s Court," "Divorce Court," and "Judge Hatchett" have highlighted female judges, while "Judge Mathis" and "Judge Joe Brown" feature African American male judges, reflecting a diverse representation. Despite her legendary status, Judge Judy's new streaming show, "Judy Justice," has faced criticism, particularly relating to its approach towards the less fortunate and the lack of the original show's fan loyalty. Critics argue that Sheindlin continues to portray an unkind, contemptuous view of those in poverty.
Interestingly, while Judge Judy presides over her show, her role is more accurately described as an arbitrator, with audience members often being paid actors from the Screen Actor's Guild. Despite its mixed reception, "Judy Justice" promises engaging real-life drama that has attracted a loyal viewership, including celebrities seeking her brand of resolution.
While some may consider the show to foster a sense of justice within its framework, it remains to be seen how effectively it mirrors true courtroom dynamics, raising questions about the balance between entertainment and authentic jurisprudence. Judge Judy's impact as a pop culture icon and a representative of justice continues to be a topic of discussion.
How Did Judge Judy Work?
Judge Judy operates as a unique form of arbitration rather than a traditional court trial. In this formatted reality court show, which follows small claims court standards, litigants represent themselves without the assistance of lawyers. Judge Judith Susan Sheindlin, widely known as Judge Judy, is a prominent American attorney, media personality, and former family court judge in Manhattan. Born on October 21, 1942, she earned her law degree in 1965, passed the New York bar exam, and began her career as a corporate lawyer, a role she quickly found unsatisfying.
Sheindlin shifted her focus to family law and became a prosecuting attorney in New York City’s family court in 1972. Her direct and assertive handling of cases attracted the attention of Ed Koch, the then mayor, who appointed her to the bench in 1982. Although "Judge Judy" resembles a courtroom setting, it functions as legally binding arbitration, meaning the parties involved agree to accept whatever judgment she provides.
In cases involving $10, 000 or less, both parties sign affidavits to settle their disputes within this framework. Notably, if a plaintiff wins, Judge Judy's production company pays them directly, rather than the defendant being responsible for the payment. This arbitration model allows for a quicker resolution than typical litigation processes, appealing to those seeking expedited justice.
Judge Judy's influence as a retired judge and arbitrator in this televised format has made her a pioneering figure in both the legal system and television history. She successfully transitioned from Judith Blum to the most famous TV judge, leveraging her experience and forthright demeanor. Those who appear on her show receive financial compensation from the studio, typically amounting to the disputed claim, reinforcing the show's arbitration model. Thus, Judge Judy stands out not only as a popular television show but also as a significant player in modern alternative dispute resolution.
Why Does Judge Wear A Wig?
Throughout history, UK judge wigs have symbolized authority in the legal system. When a judge wears a wig, it marks a shift from their personal identity to that of a legal decision-maker, fostering a sense of gravity and impartiality in the courtroom. Despite solicitors and other judicial members moving away from wearing wigs, they remain a distinct aspect of barristers' attire. The old Judicial Committees of the House of Lords and the Privy Council did not adopt court dress, instead opting for everyday business attire, reflecting the fashion of their era.
With the establishment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in 2009, justices have maintained the tradition in limited aspects. By 1680, wigs had become common among judges and barristers, serving as a symbol of wealth and status. Constructed from white or grey hair, typically powdered, the legal wig has become emblematic of British culture, alongside other traditions like marmalade on toast.
Wigmakers ensured the quality and consistent appearance of judge wigs, contributing to the professional image of the judiciary. Wigs are more than mere costume; they are integral to how the legal profession presents itself. Though debated today, some judges believe that wearing a wig creates a visual distinction between the law and those within the courtroom, serving to separate their authority. Judges may choose to forgo their wigs at times to avoid intimidating witnesses, especially children, or during excessively hot conditions.
The use of wigs does not influence legal outcomes; they represent tradition and authority, with court decisions based on law, evidence, and arguments presented. Historically, wigs signified the dignity and authority of the judiciary. While not all judges continue the practice, wigs serve as a marker of anonymity, emphasizing the distinction of the judiciary from the public. They promote a sense of formality and respectfulness in court proceedings, underscoring the gravitas of the legal process. Ultimately, judges and barristers wear wigs as a nod to legal history and to convey a formal and dignified presence in the courtroom.
Is Judge Judy A Popular Show?
Judge Judy has consistently dominated television ratings. In its 18th season (2013–14), the show achieved a household rating of 7. 2 and attracted 9. 94 million viewers, an increase of 8% from the previous season. Despite the show's title implying traditional judicial duties, the proceedings are more akin to arbitration rather than those typically found in a courthouse. Judge Judy, a certified judge, fulfills the role of an arbitrator on the program. While the show is entertaining, largely due to Judy's vibrant personality and her interactions with the litigants, opinions vary on its appropriateness for actual courtroom settings.
While Judge Judy remains a legendary figure in the courtroom genre, the introduction of "Hot Bench" demonstrates that there is space for diverse court shows, each offering a unique approach. Judy Sheindlin continues her legacy with a new series titled "Judy Justice," premiering on November 1, 2021, after the conclusion of Judge Judy's production in April 2021. Judy's signature wit and straightforward manner guide viewers through cases that range from the touching to the comical.
Known widely as Judge Judy, Judy Sheindlin has become a staple of reality courtroom programming since her show began in 1996. Although she is a retired judge, her role on television is as an arbitrator, and her rulings carry legal weight. The popularity of "Judge Judy" continues, even as she transitions from traditional network television to streaming platforms with "Judy Justice," covering disputes in areas such as child custody and employment contracts.
At 80 years old, Sheindlin shows no signs of slowing down, expanding her influence in the realm of courtroom entertainment despite criticisms of her tough style. Overall, Judge Judy stands out as a unique and enduring force in courtroom TV.
Does Judge Judy Have A Reincarnation?
"Judge Judy," an American arbitration-based reality court show, premiered on September 16, 1996, featuring former Manhattan Family Court Judge Judith Sheindlin. The series has been a staple of daytime television, showcasing Sheindlin as she adjudicates real-life small claims disputes within a simulated courtroom. Prior to appearing, participants signed arbitration contracts, thus providing the show with the legal framework typical of actual court proceedings, despite its controlled environment.
Unlike traditional court shows, "Judge Judy" distinguishes itself through its unique approach, relying on the judge's expertise rather than the typical judicial structure. Judith Sheindlin, born on October 21, 1942, in Brooklyn, New York, entered her retirement as a judge in 1996, coinciding with the show's debut. As of 2022, Sheindlin is 80 years old and remains a prominent figure in television, regarded as one of the highest-paid TV stars in America.
The show has witnessed significant longevity, rivaled only by "The People’s Court" and "Divorce Court," which have both experienced numerous cancellations and revivals over the years. A new addition to the Sheindlin legacy is her 26-year-old law clerk, Sarah, who offers a glimpse into the next generation of her work. The public continues to find fascination with Judge Judy's life, including her personal relationships and her five children: Gregory, Jamie, Jonathan, Adam, and Nicole.
Notably, the production of the show incorporates paid audience members, often identified as extras or actors, to enhance the viewing experience. Despite skepticism regarding the authenticity of the proceedings, many attest to the factual basis of the disputes, highlighting a recent episode involving a reborn artist contesting a scammer over a chargeback.
After concluding the original run of "Judge Judy," Sheindlin is set to return to the courtroom in the upcoming Freevee original series "Judy Justice," which is poised to enter syndication later in 2024. Through her sharp wit and staunch dedication to justice, Judge Judy has left an indelible mark on the television landscape, continuing to captivate audiences with her unique brand of arbitration.
Does Judge Judy Have A Kid?
Judge Judy Sheindlin, a prominent American attorney and former family court judge, has a blended family. She was first married to Ronald Levy in 1964, with whom she had two children: Jamie and Adam, before they divorced in 1976. Judge Judy gained fame with her television show, "Judge Judy," which premiered in 1996 and provided financial stability for her blended family.
Judge Judy is the mother of five children: Gregory, Jamie, Jonathan, Adam, and Nicole, and she is also a proud grandmother to 13 grandchildren. Her children include Jamie and Adam from her marriage to Ronald Levy and three stepchildren from her current marriage to Jerry Sheindlin. Judy's approach to parenting and family dynamics is often reflected in her television persona.
Judy Sheindlin was born Judith Susan Blum on October 21, 1942, to a Jewish family with roots in Germany, Russia, and Ukraine. Her father, Murray, was a dentist, while her mother, Ethel Blum, raised Judy and her younger brother, David, who is also a dentist. Judy began her legal career in 1972 and was appointed to the Manhattan Family Court by Mayor Edward Koch in 1982.
Throughout her life, Judy has emphasized the importance of raising moral children, a belief she advocates on her show and in her personal life. Judy and Jerry have been married three times, twice to each other, solidifying their bond and family unit.
Despite her no-nonsense courtroom demeanor, Judge Judy has a deep affection for her family. Her children have occasionally appeared on her show, often comically portrayed due to their youthful indiscretions. Additionally, some of her children even followed in her footsteps and pursued careers in law.
Judge Judy's legacy continues through her large family, including her grandchildren, one of whom is notably following her career path. With her extensive family ties and successful television career, she embodies both a legal authority and a dedicated family woman.
Is Judge Judy A Millionaire?
Judge Judy, whose real name is Judy Sheindlin, is a prominent American family court judge and television personality known for her successful courtroom TV show, "Judge Judy." As of June 2023, her estimated net worth is approximately $480 million, according to Forbes. She gained immense popularity, quickly surpassing "The Oprah Winfrey Show" in TV ratings within two years of her show's debut. Over 25 years on the air, Judy earned an impressive annual income of $47 million, making her one of the highest-paid stars in television.
Her fortune includes a substantial real estate portfolio worth around $50 million, comprising at least six luxury homes in various locations across the United States, including properties in Naples, Florida, Greenwich, Connecticut, Newport, Rhode Island, and Manhattan. Despite her incredible wealth, Judy's rise to stardom was marked by previous financial struggles before she transitioned to court TV.
With a net worth that places her among the wealthiest judges globally, Judge Judy is admired not just for her courtroom prowess but also for her negotiation skills and business acumen. While sources such as Celebrity Net Worth suggest her worth might be around $440 million, Forbes consistently lists her at $480 million.
Judy Sheindlin is now 80 and recently announced that "Judge Judy" would conclude production when her current contract expires. Her legacy as the highest-rated daytime program in the U. S. and her influence in the courtroom and television make her a remarkable figure in entertainment and the legal domain. As she prepares to step away from her long-running show, Judy's financial success and impact on television remain notable highlights of her impressive career.
📹 Friend’s Mom Signed Off on Tattoo for Teen! Part 2
Tattoo artist Alfredo claims Nancy said she was Crissy’s mother, so he gave the teenager a tattoo! The Original! There’s only ONE …
The daughter is a leech! She is totally placating her mom and throwing her second mom under the bus smh! I had a second mom growing up who I treasured! I try to be a second mom to my kids friends too. I would never take them for piercings and tattoos lol, but a hot meal and needed compassion come on over 😊.
I paid this guy my sister know who do tattoos $250 for a neck tattoo he started it but it hurted so bad so he said he’ll come back and finish it when I get numbing cream so I paid him not thinking shit of it cuz he know my sister he did her tattoo.. he said he was gon come back June 25th .. over the course of it healing it was peeling I noticed the outline of the tattoo was coming up, mind you the only thing he did so far to the tattoo was the outline and a little bit of shading .. nothing else until he came back … I didn’t like shit about the tattoo after it healed so I told him I didn’t want him to finish it because it don’t look shit like the pic I sent him I told him I just want atleast half my money back because he did do the outline and shading .. he said okay . Sunday I texted him and asked for my money back he told me he was gonna send it Friday which is TODAY .. he been bsn he told me he will send it back IF the person who booked a tattoo appointment with him comes and actually gets tatted and pay him the money … so I asked him wtf so that’s the only way u gon be able to give me a refund is if another mf come and pay u for a tattoo ? He like YEAH ! I’m like oh naw
I’m not saying the plaintiff’s daughter is an angel but the defendant’s daughter definitely looks like a problem. 🫣 Mostly because clearly her mom is a pushover. Why at 14 does your child need a tattoo?? Also, who cares how much she begged you. That is not your child. It would’ve been no and if you ask me again you can go home. Period. 🤷🏾
So the plaintiff says the defendant was abusing prescription meds and went into the hospital and came out on even more meds which means the defendant had a problem yet she left her 13 yr old daughter there 😅😅😅😅😅😅….ok then!!! Her and her daughter arent as lovely as they want us to believe. They all need help… Hopefully they got it as this is an old case.
Judge Judy was extremely lenient about the dirving thing. Holy crap. In the more recent episodes, if someone was behind the steering wheel of a car and should not have been, Judge Judy would have flogged the people involved. I don’t know, but I suspect the defendant (at the time of this recording) has some kind of severe depression issue and she could have been self-medicating and it turned into a different problem (drug abuse). There is just about no will power there. Anyway, hopefully that got straightened out. The plaintiff’s daughter had a mature reaction. (She should just say “Yes” instead of “Yeah.”)
I’m sorry but I think the judgement should be the other way around. The defendant should pay $2000 and the plaintiff should pay $1000. The defendant is more liable because she is the responsible party since the plaintiff is a minor. The fact that she let the plaintiff drive and then knowingly lied and signed that she was the plaintiff’s mother, makes her way more liable than a 14 year old in this case.
One of THEE all time greats, and clearly one of the kindest. We all knew she supported animals, and also the LGBTQ community, but to leave money, without any pomp or circumstance, no fanfare, no publicity…. that to me puts Bea on a much higher level than she was in my mind. One of the most amazing artists, advocates and a truly amazing Lady. We will never EVER know her like again. Today a lot of “celebrity” people don’t do anything without telling the Twitter or instagram sphere… for a true artist like Bea to do this and even the guy running the place doesn’t know….. An absolute EPIC lady who I miss dearly. Rest in peace Bea, missed and never forgotten. ❤❤
What the heck I would have called the cops and had this woman arrested for endangering my child and anyone else…she is on drugs and letting a 13 year old drive her car??!!! I know this is a show and they both get paid etc…but this should have been treated like a criminal case. The mom saying she let this kid drive because she was on drugs….omg i would be calling child protection services. Too bad they did not get pulled over by the cops for some minor issue cuz wow this mom would have gotten the book thrown at her. Most likely car towed as well as her license revoked and a hefty fine for allowing a child to drive her car..
I feel like part of the reason Judge Judy didn’t award the full amount is that she likely knows that the daughter doesn’t actually want the tattoo removed. That’s all on her mother. So rather than give to mom the money to force her daughter through a tattoo removal, she awarded her part of the money, as it was clearly the defendants’ fault.
Everybody sucks here. The plaintiff comes off as negligent for dropping her daughter at the home of someone she barely knew, who was on drugs, for an indeterminate time. The defendant seems overly permissive to the point of letting someone ELSE’S kid get a tattoo. (“I’m not just a mom. I’m a Cool Mom.”) I would also bet that the daughter has no desire to remove the tattoo; mom wants her to remove the tattoo because of how it will “look” to other people.
I Completely Disagree with JJ on the Contributory Negligence on the 14 year Old”s part. That’s a Ridiculous Judgement! In my Opinion. I think the Judge Ruled that way to save her TV Show some Money 💰 In Law, a Contract made by a Minor is unenforceable… J J decided that the Minor is Partially Responsible for a Tort? C’mon….
I get that she wanted to teach the 14 year old that there needed to be consequences for her actions. Plus her mom had a few screws loose by letting her go live with a stranger for this bizzare reason having to deal with becoming an actress. But the defendant should have paid for like 2/3 of the removal bill instead of the other way around
She knew the woman she let her daughter stay with, as she said her daughter asked her for a tattoo lots of times and she says no, and the other mother heard her say no. So they must be friends. She would also know that the defendent had an issue with drugs, but she STILL let her daughter stay there?? So JJ called it right, 1k each from the 2 mothers AND the manipulative daughter.
As much as JJ wanted to teach her a lesson in good faith and hard work for proper resolution, telling a 13-14 year old kid to make and save up $2k to get a tattoo removed in decades old pay rates for salary (classic JJ episode means minimum wage was probably way lower) I wouldn’t be surprised if she just ended up saying whatever and kept the tattoo
You pick it, I’ll stick it! Tattoo artist don’t care, the only reason he’s there is because he’s afraid of losing his license and or being sued. Have a feeling that plaintiff’s daughter is a manipulative little B and conned defendant and lied to her mother, but defendant definitely used poor judgement about a minor and someone else’s child.
I think they’re all at fault but the tattoo artist, which to my knowing (please correct me if i’m wrong) didn’t have the authority to investigate further once the consent forms were signed, and jennifer which was there just to testify. Clearly the defendant, whether she was under the influence or not, did something illegal and morally super wrong. Crissy coerced the defendant, assuming that she wasn’t really mentally strong or aware of the circumstances due to drugs, into letting her do what she wanted and she was irresponsible and impulsive about getting permanent body mods (typical teenager behavior, been there done that so i can’t really blame her for being impulsive but she should’ve at least waited until she was old enough to sign her own forms so nobody else would’ve been dragged into this mess and held responsible for her own choices). In regards to the plaintiff, i understand that the stricter you are as a parent the more ways your children find to get away with things, but letting your 13 year old kid live with a complete stranger with a weak ass excuse (“tutoring” the defendant’s daughter would NOT require her to move in with her IN ANY WAY! That’s just completely unreasonable) is just the most irresponsible thing a parent could do, regardless of “keeping in touch” (i’m assuming via phone calls) with crissy daily. Anything could have happened during that time (about which i also think the defendant lied, i think it was longer than two weeks given how little she seems to care about her kids’ safety) and any parent in their right goddamn mind would NEVER let this happen.
Defendant … wow… am almost speechless again. That woman is a menace. The fact that she is a drug addict explains it. She remembers, so this shows she is a drug addict, a liar and just plain lacking in common decency and basic morals. How could she possibly think that this was not going to turn out badly. She is clearly not living in the same dimension as the rest of us. I am very concerned for her own daughter. (Both daughters are really cute btw.) The defendant’s little girl has grown up with a complete disaster of a mother. Are there worse disaster moms out there? Yes, but this is the one revealed in this court case. The tattoo artist is gorgeous hunk of inked up and pierced up manhood.
I can’t believe how many people are buying into that wolf in sheep’s clothing’s act. That woman is not on “doctor’s” medication 😂 That lady abuses drugs recreationally. Probably drinks too. I guarantee you she does/did ( old episode) drugs and drinks with her daughter and her friends. She wanted them to like her as a “cool” mom. I had a mom like her.
I kinda dis agree yes part of it is the plantiffs fault the majority is the defendent. She falsified documents and lied. She was an adult. Thirteen year olds are not the reality is different. If you take jj takw on things, kids take on responsibility for all there stupid mistakes. Kids aren’t knowledgeable enough to make those decisions.