Is A Buddhist Tattoo Offensive?

4.5 rating based on 44 ratings

Buddha tattoos can be considered offensive to some people in varying cultures, especially those that keep Buddhism at the core of their religious or value system. In some cultures, using the image of Buddha as a tattoo is considered disrespectful, and in Thailand, it is even illegal to have a tattoo of the Buddha. Some Christians take issue with tattooing, upholding the Hebrew prohibition based on interpreting Leviticus 19:28—”Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you”—to prohibit tattoos.

The motivation for a Buddha tattoo is not entirely clear, but some believe it is a magical protection practice used by monks. The Knowing Buddha Organization has posted billboards near Bangkok’s largest airport warning incoming tourists that it is “wrong” to wear Buddhist necklaces or sport. A photo of a billboard calling for respect for Buddha’s image has been shared tens of thousands of times in multiple Facebook posts, which claim it was taken on a road in Thailand. Although getting a tattoo of a Buddha is not strictly illegal, it can be considered disrespectful and is strongly discouraged by the locals in Thailand and even Sri Lanka.

In most Buddhist countries, it is highly offensive to have a tattoo of Buddha, so much so that tourists are even sent to jail or deported. Some Thais do not like Buddha tattoos at all, but any below the waist is particularly offensive. It is not illegal but not unless the art is done in such a way as to purposefully denigrate the Buddha or Buddhism. Thailand’s Culture Ministry says foreign tourists should be barred from getting Buddhist tattoos while visiting because the practice is culturally insensitive.

Useful Articles on the Topic
ArticleDescriptionSite
Is this tattoo offensive? : r/BuddhismYes. In some cultures using the image of buddha as a tattoo is considered disrespectful, and I believe in Thailand it’s even illegal to have a …reddit.com
The Controversy Surrounding Buddha TattoosAre Buddha tattoos offensive? A Buddha tattoo can be offensive to some people in varying cultures, especially those that keep Buddhism at the …tattoodo.com
Buddha art tattoo offensive?Yes, it is a magical protection practice used by manny, including monks. Thiis is precisely why you can get kicked out of the sangha for having …dharmawheel.net

📹 Rude Buddha – Saturday Night Live

Visitors seeking wisdom and answers from a very rude Buddha might be a little disappointed. Aired 03/03/12 Subscribe to SNL: …


Which Religions Forbid Tattoos
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Which Religions Forbid Tattoos?

Tattoos have historically served significant roles in various cultural rituals and traditions. In contrast to practices in Buddhism and Hinduism, which embrace tattoos, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam generally express opposition to them. According to Jewish law, specifically Leviticus 19:28, tattoos are forbidden, stating, "You shall not make gashes in your flesh for the dead, or make any marks on yourselves." This belief extends to a Jewish concern for maintaining the sanctity of the body, as it is regarded as God's creation.

Within Islam, the consensus among scholars is that permanent tattoos are also prohibited, aligning with the idea that altering one’s body may conflict with Islamic values. Additionally, Christianity has a strong anti-tattoo tradition, with groups such as Mormons outright forbidding them, rooted in beliefs derived from Jewish teachings regarding respect for one's body, which is seen as owned by God.

Despite the prohibitions in these three major faiths, the practice of tattooing continues, especially in cultures influenced by other religions. While many Muslims avoid permanent tattoos, henna tattoos are typically accepted due to their non-permanent nature. Interestingly, some Ethiopian Jews have historically worn tattoos, which complicates the traditional anti-tattoo narrative within Judaism.

This article posits that while the established Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) generally condemn tattooing, there remains a diverse array of practices across different beliefs. For instance, modern interpretations of Jewish law may show more leniency towards tattoos. Ultimately, the position on tattoos varies not only by religion but also by individual beliefs and practices, indicating that interpretations of sacred texts and cultural norms can shape the acceptance of tattoos in a broader religious context.

What Religions Do Not Allow Tattoos
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Religions Do Not Allow Tattoos?

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam generally hold negative views towards tattoos, often prohibiting their followers from getting inked. The Talmud in Judaism explicitly forbids permanent marks on the body, considering tattooing as self-mutilation. Christianity and Islam share similar sentiments; Islam discourages tattoos, emphasizing that they are unnatural alterations to the body. Despite such restrictions from these three Abrahamic faiths, many Eastern religions, notably Buddhism and Hinduism, embrace tattoos, utilizing them as symbols of protection and devotion.

The historical roots of tattoos date back over five thousand years, with practices such as Mehndi in Hindu culture involving henna, which is non-permanent compared to tattoos. It is important to note that while traditional Hinduism might not widely endorse contemporary tattoos, the cultural perspective can vary. Cultural beliefs and traditions often dictate the acceptance of tattoos across the globe, resulting in various interpretations of religious doctrines.

In recent years, attitudes toward tattoos have begun to evolve. In some Jewish communities, a more lenient view has emerged, allowing for the possibility of tattoos among those who reconnect with their faith, known as ba’alei teshuva. Henna is widely accepted in these traditions as an alternative to permanent tattoos. Conversely, within Christianity, there are diverse opinions; while some see tattoos as permissible, others may link them to pagan practices.

Overall, tattoo acceptance greatly varies across different religions and cultures. Each individual approaches their faith uniquely, influencing their views on tattoos. While a sizable portion of "spiritual but not religious" individuals are open to tattoos, among major religious groups, tattoo acceptance is still generally low, with Buddhists being a notable exception.

Is It Disrespectful To Get A Buddhist Tattoo
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Disrespectful To Get A Buddhist Tattoo?

The topic of whether lay Buddhists can get tattoos is generally seen as a personal choice, without strict rules against it. Buddhism emphasizes that actions should not cause harm to oneself or others, leaving the decision to the individual. However, the question of getting a Buddha tattoo creates a nuanced discussion surrounding respect and cultural appropriation. Experts like tattoo artist Yoni Zilber, who specializes in Tibetan art, caution that images of the Buddha and Tibetan mantras are sacred and should be treated with reverence.

Many people engage in conversations about the appropriateness of a Buddha tattoo, with varied opinions on its significance. While some argue that tattoos of Buddhist symbols are generally acceptable, having a tattoo of the Buddha often raises concerns regarding disrespect, especially in certain cultural contexts. In specific regions, such tattoos are perceived as disrespectful, particularly if they are displayed publicly or located below the waistline.

Despite the lack of a clear religious doctrine opposing tattoos, public display of a Buddha tattoo might be construed as trivializing a revered figure, leading to potential backlash. For this reason, individuals considering getting a Buddha tattoo are often urged to think carefully and perhaps conceal it in public settings, as exposure could diminish its significance.

Debate continues around the impact and interpretative nature of such tattoos. Some see a Buddha tattoo as a sign of respect, while others view it as culturally offensive. Ultimately, the central question remains: is it indeed disrespectful for non-Buddhists to get a Buddha tattoo? While opinions vary widely between individuals and cultures, the consensus leans towards caution and consideration of the cultural and spiritual implications behind such a decision. Alternatives, such as tattoos of other Buddhist symbols, might be suggested for those interested in commemorating their respect for the teachings of Buddhism.

What Is Not Allowed In Buddhism
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Is Not Allowed In Buddhism?

Buddhism teaches five fundamental precepts that are essential commitments for practitioners aiming for enlightenment: abstaining from killing living beings, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying, and intoxication. These precepts serve as ethical guidelines designed to cultivate a moral character and promote mental development. Over thousands of years, Buddhism has spread across the globe, emphasizing the importance of following ethical rules for a wholesome life.

One key principle in Buddhism is equality; discrimination based on race, gender, caste, or creed is not tolerated, as everyone is regarded as equal in the eyes of the Buddha. The ethical precepts guide followers to avoid harmful actions towards themselves and others. This includes not only refraining from the aforementioned five prohibitions but also from engaging in other detrimental behaviors.

Practitioners are encouraged to understand these prohibitions to streamline their path toward a meaningful life. By abstaining from actions like killing (no harm to others), stealing (respecting others' belongings), and lying (upholding truth), individuals can develop compassion and awareness. While some may choose to avoid these actions as part of their spiritual journey, they are not rigidly enforced rules but commitments that foster personal growth.

Moreover, dietary restrictions play a role in Buddhist practice. The consumption of certain meats, including beef, pork, lamb, poultry, and game, is discouraged, alongside other items such as fish and eggs. Buddhism condemns violence and promotes the concept of Ahimsa, which signifies a commitment to non-harming.

In addition, the lifestyle choices of Buddhists often involve refraining from hedonistic pleasures, such as dancing, singing, and using intoxicants, to maintain clarity of thought and focus on their spiritual pursuits. Distinctions exist among different Buddhist traditions regarding interpretations of abstinence and the Middle Way, but the core precepts remain central to all practices.

In summary, the five precepts and the broader principles of ethical living guide Buddhists in leading a life of compassion, equanimity, and mindfulness, avoiding actions that cause harm to themselves and others on their path toward enlightenment.

What Religions Prohibit Tattoos
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Religions Prohibit Tattoos?

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam generally oppose tattoos, viewing them as forms of self-mutilation or alterations to the natural state of the body. In contrast, religions like Buddhism and Hinduism have a rich history of tattooing, utilizing it for various purposes, including protection and devotion. This article explores the varied stances on tattoos across different religions.

Judaism strictly prohibits tattoos based on teachings from the Talmud, which advise against making permanent marks on one’s body. The interpretation of the Biblical verse Leviticus 19:28, which states, "You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you," underpins this prohibition. However, modern interpretations are more lenient, allowing for different understandings of this commandment.

Christianity shares similar views, where some adherents uphold the Hebrew prohibition against tattoos, viewing them as violations of Biblical directives. This is evidenced by varying interpretations of Leviticus 19:28. However, like Judaism, interpretations and attitudes toward tattoos can differ widely among different Christian sects and communities.

In Islam, while there are no explicit Quranic injunctions against tattoos, teachings known as Hadiths suggest that the practice is discouraged as it alters the natural body. Nevertheless, views can vary significantly among Islamic scholars and communities, with some allowing for exceptions, such as the use of henna.

Hinduism presents a more diverse view regarding tattoos, allowing for varying acceptance across different sects and communities. Tattoos in Hindu culture often carry symbolic meanings and are sometimes incorporated into rituals and performances. As such, they are generally more accepted than in the three Abrahamic faiths.

The article highlights the nuanced perspectives on tattoos in religious contexts, emphasizing that beliefs and practices regarding body art can differ widely even within the same religion. While Christianity, Judaism, and Islam typically discourage tattoos, other religions embrace them as part of cultural and spiritual expression.

In conclusion, the general opposition to tattoos in Abrahamic faiths contrasts sharply with the acceptance found in Hindu and Buddhist traditions. The complex nature of religious interpretation suggests that whether or not tattoos are permissible can be subject to personal beliefs and practices, effectively making the question of tattooing a matter of individual faith journeys rather than blanket prohibitions across all religions. Ultimately, the significance and acceptability of tattoos are deeply tied to cultural, historical, and theological dimensions within each tradition.

Is It Racist To Do Henna
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Racist To Do Henna?

The question of whether it is offensive for non-Indians to get henna often arises, and the concise answer is that it is not offensive as long as one is mindful of its cultural significance. The potential for cultural appropriation emerges when the history and traditional uses of henna are disregarded or disrespected, particularly in the context of female beauty. Henna, derived from the leaves of the henna tree (Lawsonia inermis), has been used in various cultures for centuries to dye everything from hair to textiles.

Despite its global use, some contemporary trends, such as "henna freckles" popularized on TikTok, draw criticism for being appropriative, especially when perceived through a Eurocentric lens that overlooks the deep cultural connections associated with henna in South Asian communities.

Cultural appropriation is closely tied to power dynamics and systemic racism. For example, figures like Emma Roberts faced backlash for cultural missteps, highlighting that seemingly innocuous actions can perpetuate cultural insensitivity. The debate extends to Western beauty standards that often co-opt and misrepresent the traditions of diverse Asian and African cultures, further complicating the conversation about artistic expression versus appropriation.

While henna is widely appreciated in the West as an art form, the community of henna artists emphasizes that its origins should not be erased. Many artists advocate for cultural appreciation rather than appropriation, asserting that anyone can enjoy henna, provided it's done respectfully and with an understanding of its cultural roots. However, there is concern that the commodification of henna can strip it of its spiritual and cultural significance, turning it into a mere fashion trend devoid of meaning.

In essence, while non-Indians can certainly enjoy henna, the key lies in being respectful and acknowledging its rich cultural heritage. It’s important to recognize that henna is not owned by any single culture or race. Engaging with henna should involve an appreciation for its history and its role in cultural identity, thereby fostering unity and respect among diverse communities.

Can Buddhists Drink Alcohol
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Can Buddhists Drink Alcohol?

Buddhism teaches its adherents to avoid consuming alcohol, referred to as surāmerayamajja, as it violates the 5th of the Five Precepts, which form the ethical foundation of Buddhist practice. This precept specifically advises Buddhists to abstain from intoxication for the sake of maintaining mindfulness and progressing along the Noble Eightfold Path. Recognizing the mind as a valuable aspect of one’s being, Buddhists engage in meditation and self-discipline to cultivate mastery over it.

The Five Precepts emphasize moral behavior, with the 5th precept stating: "I undertake the training rule to abstain from fermented and distilled intoxicants which are the basis for heedlessness." While Theravada Buddhists are known to rigidly adhere to this prohibition, interpretations can vary across traditions. For example, in some communities, there is a focus on limiting consumption to avoid carelessness rather than complete abstinence.

Interestingly, beverages like coffee and tea, viewed as stimulants, can also affect mental clarity and behavior, somewhat akin to alcohol. The assessment of what is permissible can often depend on personal or communal judgment regarding the benefits or harm to one's spiritual development. In this regard, the teachings of the Buddha demand collective adherence to practices that foster positive growth, emphasizing the significance of health as a form of wealth.

Regarding the behavior of some monks who consume meat or smoke, it’s important to acknowledge that cultural influences exist. In Thailand, for instance, young individuals often spend a period in monastic life—where norms may differ from common lay practices. Buddhist tenets such as dependent arising highlight the negative effects of intoxicants on physical and mental health, reaffirming the idea that well-being is paramount in spiritual progress.

The 5th precept's clarity on alcohol suggests that the Buddha was not in favor of its consumption. Engaging in the sale of alcohol is also viewed as an improper livelihood within Buddhist ethics since it can lead to both physical and mental intoxication. For those practicing meditation, such as Vipassana, abstaining from smoking is encouraged due to risks like dizziness, impairing one’s focus.

Understanding addiction's insidious nature is crucial; it typically develops gradually, starting with social or casual drinking. As for the observance of vegetarianism, estimates suggest that around 25% of American Buddhists identify as vegetarians, a figure notably higher than the general population, though this varies widely among different Buddhist sects.

The approach to alcohol consumption does show diversity within Buddhism. While some Vajrayana practitioners incorporate it into rituals, the core teachings highlight its potential dangers. Zen teachings also address alcohol use, noting the importance of mindfulness in one’s choices.

Ultimately, the Five Precepts constitute a significant ethical framework, guiding adherents to live responsibly, refrain from intoxicants, and uphold a mindful lifestyle that aligns with the fundamental principles of Buddhism. Through these guidelines, practitioners aim to foster an environment conducive to spiritual enlightenment and personal growth.

Is It Racist To Get A Mandala Tattoo
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is It Racist To Get A Mandala Tattoo?

There is currently no significant backlash against the tattooing of mandalas or sacred geometry, provided it is done with respect and understanding of their cultural origins. Confusion arises due to the misidentification of simple geometric designs as mandalas, as mandalas are specific to Tibetan Buddhism and considered sacred objects. While some argue that having mandala tattoos is offensive and constitutes cultural appropriation, opinions are varied. This is particularly relevant for individuals without a direct connection to the culture they wish to draw from.

Most tattoo professionals draw clear boundaries against creating tattoos that promote hate speech or racism, irrespective of the financial gain involved. There's a nuanced conversation regarding cultural appropriation within creative fields, suggesting that artists often navigate ethically complex territories. For example, Paul Smith from Bijou Studio in Austin emphasizes his deep experience with traditional American and Japanese tattoos, hinting at how different cultures impact artistic practices.

When it comes to mandala tattoos specifically, care for them is crucial due to their intricate patterns. While general use of mandalas is not broadly considered cultural appropriation, cultural context greatly influences this perception. Some individuals caution against using designs that are especially sacred or detailed, as certain mandalas are deeply tied to religious practices, and only authorized practitioners, like the Buddha, should create them.

Moreover, there is a legitimacy and importance placed on those who belong to the cultural majority regarding the sensitivity toward elements of minority cultures. Many within the artistic and spiritual communities view the casual use of sacred symbols by those outside their originating culture as disrespectful. There's an ongoing discussion about whether white individuals without direct cultural ties should be getting mandala tattoos, with some findings advocating for the research of the tattoo’s significance before proceeding. Ultimately, it is essential to be aware and respectful of cultural meanings while engaging with the art form, ensuring that practices do not inadvertently offend or misappropriate cultural symbols.

Is A Tattoo Allowed In Buddhism
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

Is A Tattoo Allowed In Buddhism?

Buddhism does permit tattoos, but it's essential to approach this practice with respect for the symbols and figures represented. Generally, tattooing images of the Buddha on the lower body is considered disrespectful. Traditional Sak Yant tattoos, which are applied by hand, are administered by specially trained monks in Thai Buddhist monasteries. While some view tattoos as a demonstration of devotion to Buddhism, it’s important to remember that tattoos involving sacred Buddhist images and Tibetan mantras, according to tattooist Yoni Zilber, should not be taken lightly. The intention behind getting a tattoo plays a significant role in its acceptability within the faith.

Buddhism doesn’t impose strict prohibitions against tattoos; however, in various Asian cultures, tattooed individuals have historically been viewed negatively, often associated with criminality and savagery. This cultural perception can lead to controversy, especially regarding tattoos that deviate from traditional norms. Over centuries, tattoos have served as a medium for expressing faith and devotion, with certain Buddhist icons depicted through elaborate ink designs.

While there is no definitive teaching or rule within Buddhism explicitly prohibiting tattoos, they remain a debated subject. The Buddha himself did not comment on tattoos, leaving followers to interpret teachings with varying perspectives. Because many Buddhists see the body and tattoos as impermanent, acquiring a tattoo is generally not viewed as infringing upon Buddhist doctrines.

In essence, tattoos are acceptable as long as they do not convey offensive or derogatory meanings. Individual choice plays a crucial role here, as there is no doctrinal mandate against a lay Buddhist obtaining a tattoo. However, some adhere to a personal principle of refraining from tattoos entirely, viewing them as separate from genuine Buddhist practice.

Despite the lack of formal restriction, tattoos featuring Buddhist symbols, particularly of the Buddha, can evoke strong reactions and are often frowned upon in countries like Thailand and Sri Lanka. Ultimately, the decision to get a tattoo in a Buddhist context is a personal one, effectively merging cultural and religious sentiments with individual expression.

What Does It Mean To Have A Buddha Tattoo
(Image Source: Pixabay.com)

What Does It Mean To Have A Buddha Tattoo?

A Buddha tattoo often symbolizes love and devotion to Buddhist practices, reflecting a serious commitment to faith, akin to wearing a cross or a rosary tattoo. Beyond aesthetics, it represents a spiritual connection and embodies the core tenets of Buddhism, such as enlightenment, inner peace, and spiritual awakening. Common elements in these tattoos include the Buddha image, lotus flowers, and representations of peace and serenity, making them deeply personal symbols of one’s faith and inner strength.

The spiritual significance of Buddha tattoos emphasizes tranquility and mindfulness, allowing for creative expression in design. Whether kept simple or elaborately designed, these tattoos transcend mere visuals to convey profound meanings that resonate with wearers. Typical designs feature the smiling or laughing Buddha, along with depictions of Buddha in meditation, seated in lotus positions, and inked hands in various mudras.

Buddha tattoos are powerful symbols of enlightenment, wisdom, and serenity, serving as reminders for compassion and spiritual growth. For many, they signify a commitment to Buddhist principles, including moral living, meditation, and the understanding of suffering. However, tattooing the image of Buddha is viewed differently across various cultures; in some places, particularly in Thailand, it is regarded as disrespectful and even illegal, underscoring the importance of cultural context.

In addition to spiritual meanings, Buddha tattoos can convey associations with luck, purity, honesty, wealth, and blessings, often seen as protective symbols against evil. Despite the diverse perceptions of such tattoos globally, they remain popular among those who identify with the teachings of Buddhism, which is followed by many across the world. Overall, the Buddha tattoo represents peace, purity of life, and a spiritual journey, with numerous designs that carry individual meanings and significance.


📹 The swastika was a symbol of peace until Hitler stole it

He said: “The swastika goes back a long way, certainly before it became this symbol of evil.” “In the Chinese book of silk: you see …


64 comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • To all the beautiful people (Buddhists and Non-Buddhists) out there… ❤️ Just recall the “Akkosaka Baradhwaaja Sutta”. If someone offers you something, and you don’t wish to accept it, the offering has to remain with the one who offered it in the first place. Same applies to this content… Let me take a moment and sincerely thank the crew who created this article, and made us realise, that the noble philosophy of Buddhism has already taught us how to “let go”… Blessings from Sri Lanka 🙏

  • When buddha gained his enlightment and nirvana he saw into the past where he saw that a lot of people has already became buddha. Budhha means knowledgeable. You and I can be buddha if we go right in the path of vipassana. But every man has right to live in his own way. As a real buddhist I’m not offended by such things. Peace to you all. Love and kindness may guide your life 💓💓💓

  • Brothers and sisters, some of you are offended… please don’t and be happy that even if he is misrepresented he is giving joy to people on way or another. Buddha is no god, nor a prophet, nor does he wish ill will towards anyone… his spirit and essence is no more, he has reached enlightenment in life and had reached nirvana in death, he is free from life’s cycle… whether you believe in reincarnation or not nirvana can be obtain in just 1 life or after many reincarnation, he is no more but the remains of his teachings that guides us and his body that had nurtured the life of plants 2000 years ago. Never forget this. Sadhu

  • The word Buddha means one who is beyond his intellectual not a calm person who give commandments. People in the comments are thinking if you are buddhist you will not react to anything. And some people think buddhist are not capable of reacting to things but the truth is buddhist don’t want to give pleasure to someone else to hurt them.

  • Buddha said to his followers that if someone insults him and you feel angry, you are hurting only yourselves; If someone praises him and you feel pride, you are damaging only yourselves. Jesus said if someone smites you on the right cheek, offer them your left cheek too. It’s a shame that these great men are often made a mockery of because of their non-violent teachings. Instead of bombing people because of an insult, the world can heal from forgiveness and equanimity.

  • I am a Buddhist. But this is not really offensive. I understood this guy is doing it for humour but unfortunately the jokes are not even funny or may be I don’t get it. Buddha was a practical man and hardly left any space for supernatural non-sense and thus I think its difficult to make fun of him. This was a desperate effort to imagine what Buddha might have said but it has no context.

  • Buddhists believe that there are many Buddhas. The most recent one was Gautama Buddha. People who will become Buddhas someday are called “bodhisattvas.” Buddhists believe that the Buddha was enlightened, which means that he knew all about how to live a peaceful life and how to avoid suffering. He is said to have never argued with other people, but only said what was true and useful, out of compassion for others. Some Buddhists pray to Buddhas, but Buddhas are not gods. Buddhas are teachers who help the people who will listen. A Buddha is a human being who has woken up and can see the true way the world works. This knowledge totally changes the person so that they can have a better life in the present and the future. A Buddha can also help a person achieve enlightenment. There are ideas which are said to lead someone to enlightenment. They are called the Dharma (Sanskrit) or “Dhamma” (Pāli), meaning “the way” or “the truth.” Anyone can become a Buddha, but it is very difficult. He became Buddha under the peepal or “bodhi” tree at Bodhgaya in Bihar in what is now India. The teaching about actions and results is the Buddhist moral law of Kamma-Vipaka. Kamma (Karma in Sanskrit) is the action and Vipaka the result, though generally the word Kamma is used to cover both actions and results. Nature The first two verses of the Dhammapada summarize as: ‘Mind foreruns all conditions (….) they are mind made. If one speaks or acts with a wicked mind, because of that, pain follows one. If one speaks or acts with a good mind, because of that, happiness follows one.

  • I take this joke and laugh of course! It is indeed funny hahaha. Love this! Speaking of offense, I’m a Buddhist and this kind of thing means no offense at all merely because a Buddha is not a person or entity but a symbol of enlightment. If something named as Buddha but does not represent any enlightment factor, then it is not Buddha. Simple 😁

  • – Ajahn Brahm A local journalist called and asked me ” What would you do, Ajahn Brahm, if someone took a Buddhist Holy Book and flushed it down the toilet?” Without hesitation I answered “Sir, if someone took a Buddhist Holy Book and flushed it down the toilet, the first thing I would do is call a plumber!” When the journalist finished laughing, he confided in me that that was the most sensible answer he had heard. Then I went further. I explained that someone may blow up many statues of the Buddha, burn down Buddhist temples or kill Buddhist monks and nuns; they may destroy all of this but I will never allow them to destroy Buddhism. You may flush a Holy Book down a toilet, but you will never flush forgiveness, peace and compassion down a toilet. The book is not the religion, nor the statue, the building or the priest. These are only “containers.” What does the book teach us? What does the statue represent? What qualities are the priests supposed to embody? This is the “content”. When we recognize the difference between the container and the contents, then we will preserve the contents even when the container is being destroyed. We can print more books, build more temples and statues and even train more monks and nuns, but when we lose our love and respect for others and ourselves and replace it with violence, then the whole religion has gone down the toilet.

  • I thought Lao Tzu said a journey starts with a single step not Buddha also even though buddhism is about enlightenment and not being triggered by everything but it’s kinda uncalled for,for making a joke out of a religion.A guy rewrote the entire bible with Beyoncé and jay z and he got ALOT of hate but people are saying not to hate this so it’s like wtf…

  • BUDDHA sacrificed his family and palace to alleviate the grief of the people of the whole world and you make fun of him? Maybe not today, but one day you will understand what you were laughing at, Buddha or yourself? When you will be facing sorrows or troubles in life or maybe when you get close to your death. 🙂🙏 🌺BUDDHA🌺 BLESS YOU 🙏🙂

  • Can you imagine if this was done for Jesus, let alone less peaceful religious leaders? If it was done for Mohammed there would be huge demonstrations, people saying SNL is full of hate, and death threats. That prophet is not to be portrayed in any form let alone have satire done on him. The response I am seeing in the comments speaks well of Buddhists and their religion. My only criticism is that it is not particularly funny, other than the sound of “one hand clapping”.

  • I AM BUDDHIST . TEARS ARE TRICKLING DOWN MY CHEEKS.BUT THEY ARE NOT TEARS OF HATRED THERE ARE TEARS OF LOVE .LOVE TOWARDS MY LORD ! May the supreme lord Buddha forgive these deluded people. My dear buddhist brothers and sisters our lord taught us love let us spread love to anyone who disrespect our lord. Na hi verena verani sammanathidha kudhachanam averena cha sammanthi esa dhammo sananthano hatred is not ceased through hatred . hatred is ceased through love. this is an eternal truth. Dammapada Yamaka vagga(1st chapter) 5th verse The Supreme Lord Buddha My dear buddhists look how our lord himself replies to these kind of people . PRAISE THE SUPREME LORD BUDDHA! NAMO BUDDHAYA!

  • I am Buddhist and first time I am perusal such a different depiction of Buddha ….. great ness of Buddhist teaching is that is is realistic and don’t suggest it’s followers to engage in useless fights if they encounter people of different views. Everything can be achieved by discussion and meditation. Reduce your evil and increase you positives ….

  • Okay, Let’s imagine, if it were some other religions. Some of them might be in two pieces..😆😆😆 Guys, religions is a person business of individual. So nobody should make a joke of any such religions be it Bhudhism, Islam, Hindu, Christianity or any other tradition. You can criticised & debate about their philosophy of any religion. However, always respect teacher like Buddha or God in other religions. Universally, every religions teaches love, altruism and affection.

  • I have been following Buddhism for 3 years, been in temples and meditate often. This is funny. If read suttas from Pali canon at least to me, many occasion – Buddha was also a bit funny and ironical man. I think it is a way of smart and intelligent person. Try to make jokes on Muhammad or Allah then its other story 😀

  • Buddha teaches this to ordinary people. Step by Step from easy to hard 1) Be kind and generous to yourself and those around you 2) Be mindful of your words and behaviors 3) Be aware of where true happiness lies (for you) 4) Beware of karma, because it will bite you in the butt (basically don’t be a prick) 5) Be enlightened to the truth of life (what is the truth of life? Pain, suffering, desire, cruelty, happiness etc.) I’m Buddhist born in Thailand, and I hope this can help someone lead a better life.

  • Do not insult Buddhism in this manner. That’s not a joke. The Buddha is not such a joke. This is not how the Buddha preached the Dhamma to his disciples. The Buddha did not preach the Dhamma with women like this. The Buddha is the teacher of a world free from all defilements. This article gives the world a misunderstanding about Buddhism. Karma will reward you and those who contributed to the production of this program.

  • In his whole life Hitler never call it a Swastik Hitler called it hooked Cross. After the world war the European change it in Swastik because who would hooked cross is the one of the symbol of Christianity. And if we read the oldest autobiography of Hitler before World War 2 there was not a single word about Swastik

  • Stealing swastika has to be the worst form of cultural appropriation till date. Being an Indian living in continental Europe, I have to think many times if I can draw a swastik outside my door on special occasions / festivals. I end up drawing it inside our home to avoid racial discrimination ( which is already rife in that part of the world)

  • I grew up in Europe and learned about the Nazi regime in school. When I first went to my parents homeland in Asia I was shocked on so many levels by how many of the symbols I saw there. (Also my uncle has a tattoo of it). But I then researched and found out that it has a very different meaning, also it has been used in Asia for a way longer time before the Nazis started using it.

  • From सु- (sú, “good, well”) + अस्ति (ásti-), a verbal abstract to the root of the verb “to be”, svasti thus meaning “well-being” — and the diminutive suffix क (-ka); hence “little thing associated with well-being”, corresponding roughly to “lucky charm”. The word first appears in the Classical Sanskrit (in the Ramayana and Mahabharata epics).

  • The swastika in various forms has been used by many cultures for many centuries. The meanings of the symbol differ from culture to culture. It always was a powerful symbol though not always peaceful, In Germanic cultures it was a symbol of solar power and strength. It was also a representation for Thor (Donnar in Germany) The direction indicated the flow of power, i.e. drawing in or broadcasting out of power, The Nazi Party chose that symbol and many others because of the cultural meanings of them. All having to do with strength, power, loyalty, and other such virtues they wanted associated with their nation/party. Symbols used for thousands of years do not suddenly become evil because some twisted people use them poorly for a couple decades. Then again, I’m sure if there were any non-Christian survivors of the European crusades, they would see the cross as “evil”

  • Living in Europe means to live in victimized culture so every time when you see Swastika you must act in certain way … But when we start analyse history and we discovery more facts slowly we see ho is victim of very bad education… I love Swastika its my Tibetan Bon Holy Symbol, its symbol of Unity of all tribes around the world knowing this, knowing facts make me to think that talking with people who are not open for knowledge and personal spiritual growth its pointless …

  • Hitler never called his Nazi symbol as ‘Swastika’ and not influenced by ‘Hinduism’ or any other ‘Dharmic’ relegion. The symbol that Hitler actually used is ‘Hooked Cross’ religious symbol of ‘Christianity’. He was a hardcore christian, he and he’s Nazi people often wear ‘Cross’. In era of 1940’s western media started to call this symbol as ‘Swastika’ to ensure the goodwill and image of christianity among people, before that this symbol usually called as ‘Nazi symbol’ or ‘Haken kreuz’ (German translation of Hooked Cross).

  • Seeing how Fee Lynn calls every single person who understands the real meaning of the swastika “racist” shows how overprotective and ignorant some people are. It’s funny how someone who promotes hate toward every Hindu has the right to call others racists. Does he know that there are multiple symbols meaning peace? Judging by his opinion which isn’t based on any fact I guess he doesn’t.

  • I was shocked the first time I was invited to see a successful business owners private collection of very ancient Chinese and Asian art work and statues when I saw a Buddha with a swastika on its chest. It was then explained to me that it once had a peace origin before it was reversed and tilted. Other interesting facts is there was some art that looked Native American. Thus the whole land bridge of ancient times that connected Asia with North America/Alaska.

  • The title isn’t that true. The Swastika was still a symbol of peace when the NSDAP Used it, and when they took over. They were a group of socialists, who strongly believed in Worker Rights. Yes, I know, The Third Reich was fascist, and for those dummies out there, fascist is anti-Marxist, and communism, as well as socialism, is Marxist. Though, it still was a symbol of peace. It was a symbol of peace, and somewhat “equality” for them. Even In war, it meant peace. You can criticize me for this, but they didn’t steal it for the use of waging war, and fellow open-minded men and women know this.

  • Swatika/Sauwastika is a symbol of divinity, spirituality, in Hinduism and Buddhism. It is a symbol of auspiciousness, good luck, well being. The word 《SWASTIKA》comes from SANSKRIT 《SWASTIK》. In Hinduism, the symbol with arms pointing clockwise is called 《Swastika《symbolizing SURYA(Sun)》, prosperity and good luck, 》while the counterclockwise symbol is calls 《SAUWASTIKA》symbolizing (night or tantric aspects of kali)

  • Call it Gammadion or hakenkreuz or hooked cross which the Hitler referred to, got influenced by and used as symbol in his lifetime. Calling it swastika doesn’t make sense as the word was never used by Hitler in his life period, beside swastika has a profound meaning and implications in Asian countries specially in India. Swastika is and always will be a symbol of peace. So let the things be as it should be and not other way around.

  • Swastika is ancient Vinča symbol of the Aryans, oldest ones were found in Ukraine. As Aryans spread out further west and south to Persia and India subcontinent, Swastika went along. In India, Aryans founded Vedic Sanskrit civilization, Swastika became the symbol of Vedic and its offshoot religions, Jainism, Buddhism and Hinduism. Hence, Swastika is common to Europeans, Buddhist and Hindu. That was also how Indo-European language family spread out.

  • Hitler’s sign is called Hakenkreuz in German which means hooked cross (Haken = hook, kreuz = cross). Hitler never used the word swastika. The hook cross is a type of Christian cross. Hitler was a staunch Christian so he used the Hooked cross as his symbol. The Swastika is a separate symbol used by Hindus that is not related to the Christian cross. Before Hitler, Christians used to call the swastika some kind of cross, but after Hitler they started calling their hook cross a type of swastika to shift the blame of Hitler’s crime on the Hindus. with the passage of time many Christians delebrately began to mistranslate Heckenkreuz as the swastika and associated it with the Hindus of India, to shift the blame for Hitler’s assassination from Christian to Hindu

  • Swastika is ancient Vinča symbol of the Aryans, the oldest ones were found in Ukraine. These people then moved further west to Europe, and down to South Asia in 1500 BC. That was how Indo-European language family spread out. In South Asia, Aryans created Vedic Sanskrit civilization, Swastika became the symbol of Vedic and its offshoot religions, Buddhism and Hinduism. Hence, Swastika is common to Europeans, Buddhist and Hindu.

  • Actually Swastika is a symbol of world drama /srishti chakra . it shows that our srishti chakr has 4 yug,golden (satyug)silver (tretayug)copper dwaperyug and iron age (kaliyug) and this chakra is always rotating day by day.it started from saryug and end with kaliyug . again it starts from satyug. it shows one more thing that durations of each age aur yuga are also same means accurate same.if our world is crossing the part of last stage of kaliyug that means very soon the world drama will reach in satyug.

  • Hey, EXTREMELY IMPORTANT CORRECTION- The symbol IS THE SWASTIKA, you are confusing it with Hitler’s HOOKED CROSS OR HAKENKREUZ. It is a common misconception that Hitler used the Swastika symbol. But Hitler himself never used the word “Swastika” to refer to his symbol. He called it “Hooked Cross”(“Haken Kreuz”). Hitler first saw the Hooked Cross symbol in a Christian monastery (Lambach Abbey) which he attended as a boy. He later adopted it as an emblem for his party. Hooked Cross had been a sacred symbol of Christianity since its inception in ancient days and it is very natural to find Hooked Cross symbol in old churches and chapels. On the other hand, the symbol of SWASTIKA is a holy sign in Hinduism that implies something fortunate, lucky or auspicious and it denotes auspiciousness or well-being. Swastika is also a sacred & holy symbol in other Indic faiths. Hope this helps. 👍🏻🙂

  • Oldest Swastika was found in Ukraine. As Aryans spread out further west to Europe and south to India subcontinent, Swastika went along. In India, Aryans founded Vedic Sanskrit civilization, Swastika became the symbol of Vedic and its offshoot religions, Jainism, Buddhism & Hinduism. Hence, Swastika is common to Europeans, Buddhist and Hindu. That’s also how Indo-European language family spread out.

  • I am one of the few people on the internet who is trying to show that the Swastika is not a symbol of hate and evil. By creating my own unique looking Swastika and using it as my personal profile Icon for all my online accounts. And as I type this comment Nothing seriously bad has happened to me about it.

  • I had a batik with a swastika symbol on it. I didn’t even notice that symbol at all, until years later after the my family bought the clothes for me. I usually used in school in Fridays and nobody even saw it including my teachers. When I discovered it, I thought of two things, 1. The Hindu peace symbol and 2. The funni moustache man’s empire logo.

  • My folks told me Swastika symbol is receiving fortune by hard work using arms and legs, working towards a goal with hard work and receiving the rewards that come from merit and from the source of Love which equals to honesty and shows the world your accumulated skills and talent thru that hard work and thus nobody can steal it, Swastik is an award “symbol of self motivation” to achieve goals thru your own pure merit.

  • The swastika symbol shown in the article (left-facing one) is used a lot in Jainism & buddhism. This is not the N*zi swastika, N*zi swastika are right facing. N*zi swastika are an appropriation of the original symbol. The swastika is a symbol widely used in eurasian religions/cultures such as hinduism and buddhism. (Not all right facing swastika are N*zi swastika as well.)

  • He didn’t steal it from Indians, he took it from archaeological finds in the Germanic region. Because it’s one of the oldest known symbols in Europe, and he used it for those propaganda purposes. It’s found all the way back to the ancient Greeks, to the comparatively more recent Norse picture stones, and regions inhabited by Slavic tribes. It’s even found in South America. It’s just a very common symbol. Either because of of some common culture going back a very, very long time, or because the symbol itself is a fairly basic pattern that many cultures thought of.

  • NONONO. Hitler didn’t stole it. Everyone must watch Silence of Swastik Movie which is available on YouTube for free. Reality will make you sweaty. It was a christian priest who translated German biography of Hitler to English and replace the word Hakenkruez or Gammadian to swastik. It was well planned attempt to spoil the image of Hinduism by Christian Pope along with New York times in 1941. Your website is still telling the manipulative story! Don’t forget Hitler was a hardcore Christian.

  • swastika is a prominent symbol of goodness ( its a sanskrit word ) its frequently used in bhuddhism, hindusim, jainism, sikhism and Zoroastrians ( erstwhile iran before it became muslim )…swastika represents the eternal goodness and eternal happiness just coz hitler stole it and used it does not mean the symbol should be discarded ( hitler called hooked cross btw) .

  • The phrase “cultural appropriation” gets thrown around a lot on the internet but I’m not sure that everyone really knows what it means. Cultural appropriation is taking from another’s culture for one’s own profit, typically at the expense of those whose culture was taken from. Hitler’s use of the swastika is an example of cultural appropriation to the highest extreme. The swastika was a symbol which was sacred to many Asian cultures. As Tim Marshall mentions in the article, Hitler transformed the common perception of the swastika symbol from being one of good luck and well-being to an evil symbol of fear and oppression (at least from an American/European perspective). Tim Marshall mentioned that despite the swastika being evil in our culture, in Asia this symbol has nothing to do with the Nazis. However, many people outside of Asia are completely unaware of the swastika’s origins. I went to China around four years ago and I remember being really freaked out after passing by a flag with a swastika on it. However, thinking about it today I have no idea whether what I saw was a sign of anti-Semitism or if it meant something else entirely. It’s so sad that this once sacred symbol has now become this symbol of evil.

  • If Hitler hadn’t used the swastika for his flags and banners, I think it’s possible that the swastika would’ve been a bit more common to see. Then we wouldn’t have associated with this evil twisted definition. If anything, I like the design itself. It’s most definitely going to take a long time until humanity has fully recovered from World War II. That is if we’re still alive by then.

  • I know we’re speaking in general when we say it’ll take several hundred years… … But as one that grew up in the west and now would identify as hindu, I’ll tell you this ego does not first go to “Nazis” when I see the symbol. Also, the more we say “oh it’ll take x amount of years” the more we subconsciously create that reality. This is entirely relative, and if it was at the forefront of sociological issues we would be able to shift the average perception quickly.

  • Hitler didn’t call the symbol a “Swastika.” U R CORRECT. Also Hitler NEVER self-identified as a “Fascist” nor “Nazi.” There was no “Nazi Party.” The article is wrong about almost everything. YouTube articles hide that fact that Hitler self-identified as “SOCIALIST” by the very word in voluminous speeches and writings. The swastika represented S-letter shapes for “SOCIALISM” under Hitler (that is one of the many amazing historical discoveries in Dr. Rex Curry’s work). Hitler changed the name of his party to “National Socialist German Workers Party” because the party’s older name did not contain the word “socialist” which he needed for his comprehensive socialist branding campaign that tied the party’s name to his “S for socialist” Hakenkreuz symbol (this is another AMAZING discovery by Dr. Curry). In that sense, Hitler HAD to change the party’s name to make it work with the “S” shape symbolism of its logo. articles like this are made by people who are embarrassed to admit that they self-identify the same as Hitler: SOCIALISTS. The vids perpetuate ignorance that is widespread: Almost everyone believes (incorrectly) that Hitler ran around roaring in speeches and writings about his “Nazis” or “Fascists” (Hitler did not, ever). YouTube viewers doubtlessly believe that. In the sense just stated, there was no “Nazi Party” nor “Nazi Germany,” and they are popular misnomers. The terms “Nazi” and “Fascist” are used today to hide how Hitler DID self-identify: SOCIALIST. Very few people today are aware of the info in the preceding sentences.

  • Hitlers symbol is not Hindu swastika but Christian hooked cross. It was James Murphy a Christian pastor who deliberately translated hooked cross as swastika. He was clearly trying to show Hindu faith in bad light so that their dubious missionary conversion factory can run their tirades against Hindu beliefs. Hitler himself never mentioned swastika. The western world readily probagated this lie as this suited their ruthless colonial racial fanaticism.

  • How do you take people who are not even knowledgeable enough to know that, Hitler never even used the term swastika ever, He used HeikenKreuz, meaning hooked cross, and can be seen in many Byzantine period roman catholic church, Hitler actually Found Indians Substandard race like any other european ethnicity, He did not back any Hindu Philosophy, but did had affiliations from Vatican City 🤷🏻‍♂️.

  • whoever says that the swastika symbol is good because it meant peace before Nazi regime are selfish. Because regardless swastika was symbol of peace thousands years ago, there are tons of people who got hurt because of this symbol. And there are tons of victims who feels hurt when they see swastika symbol. The historical fact in this case is not important. It is about respect. even though this symbol meant to be good thing in orginal, if there are group of victims who feel violation from this symbol, we should not use this symbol. This is the common sense of society. Let’s not being nerdy here. And let’s be social.

  • I forget what documentary it was but it said when Hitler was designing his flag he called it “the hooked cross” Also just by looking at the center of each symbol you can see a slight difference for example the Hindu symbol’s center is more like a plus sign while the nazi symbol’s is more like the letter X with the way it’s angled

  • Examples of ancient swastikas have been uncovered on every continent. I take this to mean that at one time in earth’s history there existed a global religion / culture. It’s a shame that the pure symbolism of the swastika has been corrupted by international politics. I think it will reappear at some point, stronger and more meaningful than ever before, after this age of deception comes to an end.

  • This symbol can be found carved in ancient Indian temples built thousands of years back even when Christianity was not born and this word is from SANSKRIT language which is the oldest language on planet. So don’t tell us that we took this symbol from somebody else. This thing is western people used to call this symbol as ‘Hakenkreuz’ which meant hooked cross but very cleverly western people started calling it SWASTIKA to defend Christianity because they didn’t want the world to know that so many innocent people were killed under their Holy cross and Indians who were under British control and fighting for the freedom couldn’t do anything about it But from now on please pronounce it the correctly when you associate this symbol with Nazi party that is HAKENKREUZ

  • Hilter never stole the swastika. In fact he never used the word Swastika his entire life. The symbol is actually called HAKENKRUEZ, in German, a Christian symbol. The westerners started associating and popularising the word SWASTIKA, as a symbol used by Hitler, to avoid the stigma it would have brought to CHRISTIANITY after Hitler massacred the JEWS.

  • Poor Jews endured terrible things under the symbol. Hindus never wanted to hurt Jews or eradicate Jews. Hopefully evil people who want to do that will become kind hearted towards Jews. Jews are not bad people but they are just a little different. They often struggle to work hard, observe their religious obligation, help the community discretely and are generally very frugal. Let’s be supportive of them

  • Einstein’s diary about how Japanese were “Intelligent but not artistic… Natural predisposition?” applies and stays correct to Asia, Indians, and many people. Indians intelligent to study enough to know what the word is in German, but not artistic to realize you can make this symbol on mistake, it’s a simple pattern. That’s why it seen as good luck or fortune.

  • according to me Hitler did not steal the Swastika. It is a symbol that has been in use in both India and Europe since ancient times. Just like you will find Swastikas in ancient Hindu scriptures, you will also find a similar symbol in ancient Roman scriptures, weapons and pottery. Same for Celtic and ancient Germanic artefacts.

  • The real truth is that Swatika was never owned by the Nazis. It was stolen from Buddhism which signifies the Peace and in Hinduism Surya which means Sun symbolising prosperity and good luck. History of swastika is running back to 10000 years as in books. This was used by Sri Lankan and Indians to show the brotherhood to each other. Even Sri lanka and India has had strong trade realtionships so they have used this sign in coin named swastika in those days to show the brotherhood. However sadly, it was popular as a symbol of Nazi party ever since they stole it from the legendary Asians. Until now people associate Swastika to Nazi racism Neo Nazi which is very wrong.

  • Hitler didn’t stole it from Indians or Hindus. This symbol exist in many civilization across the globe except Australian continent. It originated in India during the vedic times. But the Hitler called his symbol Hakenkreuz. Which come from the closest Greeks symbol of tetragamadian. Church also had it’s own name.

  • Actually for the people of India and other countries under the rule of English and French empires the swastika is in a sense freed them from their oppression. How many people were starved when England took the food from India? The western perspective is based on the western experience so to vilify the swastika carries more voice since the emerging empires were still western after WW2.

  • Hitler never called his symbol as “Swastika”, its just some Western white Christians & NY Times, after Hitler’s death who wanted to disown Hitler as a white western Christian & started calling Naazi symbol “Hukencruz” in German or “Hooked Cross” in English as a “Swastika”. Swastika is a 1000s of yrs old meaningful Sanskrit language word, which means good fortune & still today used by Hindus, Jains & Buddhists as a peaceful symbol.

  • There is difference between the SWASTIKA and HANKENKREUZ ( Nazi symbol) The swastika is which is on the thumbnail with dots is the holy symbol in hindu culture and other religions like Buddhism etc . And notice that the swastika on the thumbnail is straight, however the German Hankenkreuz is slightly bent in terms of orientation. So there’s the difference. So technically the traditional Hindu Swastika and the Hankenkreuz has very different meanings just because of their orientation.HANKENKREUZ and SWASTIKA are not same

  • It is not a symbol of peace. J. Robert Oppenheimer, American physicist and director of the Manhattan Project, learned Sanskrit in 1933 and read the Bhagavad Gita in the original form, citing it later as one of the most influential books to shape his philosophy of life. Oppenheimer later recalled that, while witnessing the explosion of the Trinity nuclear test, he thought of verses from the Bhagavad Gita (XI,12): If the radiance of a thousand suns were to burst at once into the sky, that would be like the splendor of the mighty one … Years later he would explain that another verse had also entered his head at that time: We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty and, to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, ‘Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.’ I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.

  • Hankenkreuz or hooked cross is not Swastika. Hakkencruez is a Christian religious symbol. One of the 5 different cross used in Christianity. Hitler was a devout Christian. No where in Mein Kampf or anywhere in his speeches he mentioned the symbol as Swastika. He always mentioned it as Hankenkreuz. James Murphy who mistranslated Mein Kampf and mentions Hankenkreuz as Swastika because as a Christian priest, he didn’t want to demonize Christianity and demonized a Hindu symbol of Auspiciousness instead.

Tattoo Test: Find Your Perfect Ink

What level of pain are you ready to endure?
The tattoo process can be painful. Let’s see your tolerance.

Latest Publications

Latest Comments

Tip of the day!

Pin It on Pinterest

We use cookies in order to give you the best possible experience on our website. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies.
Accept
Privacy Policy