The article discusses the debate surrounding cultural appropriation, particularly in tattoo culture. It explores the idea that cultural tattoos, such as the geisha, are symbols of appreciation or appropriation, and how it can be seen as offensive or culturally inappropriate. The author suggests that all humans are born with a mix of cultural heritage and are not meant to be influenced by other cultures.
The author also discusses the contentious history with food and the ethical implications of getting a cultural tattoo as a symbol when one is not part of that culture. Cultural appropriation is defined as the act of taking something from another culture without respect, knowledge, and understanding. This issue has become a major battleground for social justice, with recent examples like Justin Trudeau’s Haida-inspired bicep piece being questioned for its cultural appropriation.
The author argues that cultural appropriation is a fake issue that does not exist today. Historically, getting a geisha tattoo served as an indication of appreciation for beauty and refined manners while maintaining an air of mystery. Cultural appropriation is common in tattoo culture, with many white people sporting tribal blackwork designs inspired by Maori culture. Dragons and geishas styled after Japanese tattoos are also popular among Americans.
In conclusion, cultural appropriation involves the adoption of specific aspects of a culture that are not one’s own. Understanding the meanings, avoiding stereotypes, and respecting heritage are essential in addressing this issue.
| Article | Description | Site |
|---|---|---|
| What are people’s opinions on getting a Japanese … | No. The way that cultural appropriation is used today, simply just doesn’t exist. It is a fake issue. Made-up. | quora.com |
| Geisha Tattoos Cultural Appropriation | Historically, getting a geisha tattoo. served as an indication of one’s appreciation for beauty. and refined manners, while maintaining an … | tiktok.com |
| Appreciation VS Appropriation in Tattooing | Cultural appropriation is defined as the act of taking something from another culture without respect, knowledge, and understanding of that … | dirtyeyeballart.com |
📹 What Are Cultural Appropriation Tattoos?
TATtalk is a podcast sponsored by Island TAT Evolve tattoo studio. We discuss different topics on tattooing, designs, and culture.
What Does A Geisha Tattoo Symbolize?
A geisha tattoo transcends the surface symbolism of beauty and mystery, embodying deeper connotations such as feminine power, resilience, and the rich traditions of Japanese art and culture. These tattoos draw inspiration from Japanese female entertainers, known for their artistry, mystique, and meticulousness. They reflect a respect for the Geisha culture and aspire to cultivate qualities like persistence, drive, and a commitment to one’s craft.
Additionally, geisha tattoos encapsulate the illusion and secrecy integral to the Geisha world, where practitioners adhere to a code of honor that forbids them from disclosing what they hear from clients.
For many, a geisha tattoo signifies profound appreciation and respect for Japanese culture. Despite their delicate aura, geishas possess remarkable strength and independence, navigating societal expectations with grace. Symbolism within geisha tattoos often includes elements like cherry blossoms, which represent the fleeting nature of life, and kimonos and umbrellas, each carrying unique meanings. The geisha, an iconic figure in Japanese culture, symbolizes elegance and mystery.
The evolution of the geisha tradition dates back to the 1700s, initially dominated by male entertainers. The term 'geisha' combines 'gei,' meaning 'art,' and 'sha,' translating to 'person who does,' thus designating them as 'artists.' This highlights that geisha tattoos embody feminine energy, sensuality, and elegance, reflecting the inner strength that belies their delicate appearance.
On a woman's body, a geisha tattoo represents inner beauty and femininity, suggesting a profound mental resilience beneath layers of mystery and intrigue. For men, it conveys hidden aspirations and dreams. Ultimately, these tattoos symbolize respect for Japanese culture and the qualities represented by geishas, such as beauty, grace, and artistic mastery.
In essence, a geisha tattoo often communicates a blend of empowerment, cultural appreciation, and respect for the nuanced representations of women in society. The geisha transcends mere caricature, standing for attributes that call for recognition and equality. Thus, a geisha tattoo serves as a profound visual expression of elegance, resilience, and a deep-rooted connection to Japanese heritage, making it a meaningful choice for many tattoo enthusiasts.
Is It Rude To Take Pictures Of Geisha?
In Kyoto, it is crucial to respect the privacy of maiko (apprentice geisha) and geiko (trained geisha) when it comes to photography. The primary rule is clear: do not take a picture without consent. The only exceptions are during public performances or events. If you wish to ask for a photo, the polite phrase to use in Japanese is "Sumimasen, shashin o totte mo ii desu ka?" (Excuse me, may I take a picture?).
According to the official guidelines on geisha etiquette, it is unacceptable to stop, touch, follow, or capture unauthorized photos/videos of any geiko or maiko you may encounter in the Gion district. The most respectful way to take a picture with a geisha is to hire her, as they are private entertainers whose services can be purchased. However, hiring a geisha can be challenging for foreigners because this business relies heavily on trust, and ochaya (teahouses) typically work with familiar clients.
It is important to note that asking for a photo outright is not advisable, as geiko and maiko are often busy attending to clients or professional engagements. Many complaints have risen in recent years regarding tourists behaving aggressively to take pictures, damaging the reputation of foreign visitors in general. It's essential to be mindful of their circumstances and avoid acting like a paparazzi, as this behavior is deemed rude and completely unacceptable.
Tourists posing a nuisance to maiko and geiko have become increasingly prevalent, leading local authorities to impose fines. In Kyoto, there are penalties of up to 10, 000 Yen (approximately £70) for those who harass geisha for photographs. While polite inquiries for photographs are generally permissible, individuals should remember that geiko and maiko are professionals on their way to work or appointments.
Additionally, tourists should be aware that consent is vital, and asking a geisha to stop their activities for a photo is akin to requesting a free service. Such behavior can lead to trouble and further tarnish the reputation of tourists. It is also highlighted that photographers and tourists often forget that real people live and work in these spaces, emphasizing the importance of respecting their privacy and professional lives.
In conclusion, while it may be tempting to capture a memory with a geiko or maiko, it is crucial to adhere to the proper etiquette and seek permission or participate in designated events where photography is allowed.
Is It Disrespectful To Get A Geisha Tattoo?
Traditional Japanese tattoos are deeply embedded in the culture and history of Japan and hold significant meaning for many individuals. The act of appropriating these tattoos for fashion or trend-oriented purposes can be seen as offensive and is often categorized as cultural appropriation. For instance, while considering a geisha tattoo, a person may be torn between their desire for self-expression and concerns about cultural sensitivity, as some view such choices as inappropriate.
Debates surrounding cultural tattoos often position them as either forms of appreciation or as offensive cultural appropriation. Both viewpoints highlight the importance of engaging with these tattoos in a respectful manner that honors their cultural significance. It is crucial to understand the implications behind getting such tattoos, as disrespecting the tradition can lead to serious backlash, including ostracism from artists or communities.
Geisha tattoos, while popular and visually striking, can carry varied meanings associated with femininity, beauty, and the hard work of Geisha performers. However, there is often a misunderstanding regarding their symbolism, sometimes wrongly linking them to negative connotations. Some individuals consider getting these tattoos as a way to connect with Japanese culture, but it is essential to approach the decision with mindfulness.
In contemporary contexts, Japanese tattoos can resonate as symbols of respect for the culture, reflecting personal admiration for its traditions. However, without conscious consideration of the meanings behind the chosen designs, these tattoos may unintentionally veer into the territory of cultural appropriation.
Ultimately, the decision to get a geisha or any traditional Japanese tattoo should be made carefully, weighing personal motivations and the broader cultural context. A well-informed approach can ensure that one's choice of tattoo honors the underlying traditions rather than disrespects them.
Does Japan Care If Foreigners Have Tattoos?
Japan permits foreigners with tattoos to visit the country, but there are particular considerations for travelers with visible ink. While tattoos are not illegal, individuals with visible tattoos may encounter restrictions at certain venues, particularly onsen (hot springs), gyms, swimming pools, and traditional ryokans (inns), as tattoos are historically linked to the Yakuza, Japan's organized crime syndicate. Despite this stigma, many casual settings, such as shopping malls and restaurants, typically do not impose restrictions on foreign visitors displaying tattoos.
For foreign tourists with tattoos, it's advisable to be aware of specific cultural attitudes. Some traditional places may deny entry to those with visible tattoos, especially onsens, though there are numerous alternatives available that welcome tattooed guests. Travelers are encouraged to check ahead with establishments about their tattoo policies to avoid any inconveniences.
In terms of general acceptance, the cultural perception of tattoos in Japan is indeed complex. Most Japanese people are aware that tattoos are common among foreigners, and while they may personally prefer to keep their tattoos covered, many are not particularly offended by tattoos on travelers. Conversations with expats in Japan reveal that their tattoos have not significantly impacted their everyday lives or interactions, although experiences can vary.
It is crucial for travelers to navigate the landscape of tattoos in Japan mindfully. Covering tattoos when visiting traditional sites or engaging with local customs may enhance the experience and encourage a positive reception. While tattoos do not impede one’s ability to travel in Japan—visiting cities, exploring local culture, and utilizing public transport is generally permissible—awareness about the sensitivities surrounding tattoos is beneficial.
Overall, Japan allows tourists with tattoos to visit, yet maintaining respect for local customs by covering tattoos when appropriate or opting for tattoo-friendly venues can provide a more enjoyable travel experience. Knowing when and where tattoos could be perceived negatively is essential for making the most of one’s visit, as Japanese society has not fully normalized the display of tattoos, despite their increasing global acceptance. Therefore, travelers should strategize ahead to ensure a smooth adventure during their time in Japan.
Is It Legal To Get A Japanese Tattoo?
Tattoos are not illegal in Japan; while they are recognized as a form of art by some, the Japanese government associates them with the Yakuza, a notorious gang known for elaborate body tattoos. Adults aged 18 and over can legally get tattoos in Japan, provided that tattoo artists adhere to regulations related to sterilization and equipment registration. However, many establishments, particularly onsens (hot springs), gyms, and public pools, choose to prohibit entry to individuals with visible tattoos. This creates a significant challenge for both locals and tourists, as such restrictions can limit access to leisure facilities.
Despite the legality of tattoos, social stigma remains powerful in Japan. Having tattoos can affect social interactions and employment opportunities, as they are often viewed negatively due to their association with criminality and gangs. As a result, while it is common to see people with tattoos in everyday contexts, individuals may face significant barriers in certain public spaces, especially those that enforce a tattoo ban.
In a significant change in 2020, the Japanese Supreme Court ruled that tattoo artists could operate without a medical license, a decision that previously required artists to be medically certified or face heavy fines. Additionally, tourists can get tattoos legally, as long as they abide by certain guidelines regarding age and health considerations. Specifically, individuals over 18 can obtain tattoos with written permission from health authorities, while minors require parental consent.
It is important to note that even though tattoos are legal, visible tattoos can lead to prohibitions in specific settings. Most casual venues such as restaurants or shopping malls do not enforce bans. However, establishments may display clear signs indicating their policies regarding tattoos.
Cultural considerations are also vital when considering obtaining tattoos linked to Japanese traditions. While traditional tattoos can be appreciated, sensitivity to their cultural significance and the context in which they are received is paramount. The acceptance of tattooing and its practice continue to evolve in Japan, yet the deep-rooted societal perceptions continue to pose challenges for those with tattoos, both locals and visitors alike. While having tattoos is not illegal, it's advisable to be aware of the cultural implications and restrictions in specific venues across Japan.
What Are The Rules For Japanese Tattoos?
When considering a traditional Japanese tattoo, it is essential to understand and respect several fundamental rules that govern this intricate art form.
Rule One states that the tattoo should be large, ideally covering a broad area or entire body part. Such tattoos are typically characterized by vibrant, richly detailed designs that incorporate clean and pure colors.
Rule Two emphasizes the importance of including themes and symbols that reflect Japanese culture. This not only honors the traditional aspects of Japanese tattooing but also imbues the tattoo with cultural significance.
The third rule highlights that the design and application of the tattoo should be predominantly traditional. Mastering this art form requires years of training and dedication, making it crucial to work with a skilled and experienced artist.
In Japanese culture, tattoos are considered something to be earned, rather than just a fashion statement or act of rebellion. This principle underscores the deep cultural roots of traditional tattoos, which are filled with symbolism and meaning derived from the elements depicted, such as animals and colors.
Additionally, individuals seeking to get a traditional Japanese tattoo must conduct thorough research to choose authentic designs and gain an understanding of the commitment involved.
Overall, respecting the cultural significance and adhering to the rules surrounding traditional Japanese tattoos ensures a meaningful and respectful experience. By doing so, one can appreciate the artistry and history embedded within this unique form of self-expression, while also enjoying the deep connection that such tattoos represent in Japanese culture. Therefore, understanding these essential rules is key to navigating the fascinating world of traditional Japanese tattooing.
What Does A Geisha Girl Symbolize?
日本文化において、芸者のイメージは非常に強く根付いています。彼女たちは日本の古典を象徴するロマンティックな存在であり、神秘的で優雅、力強く、セクシャルな一方で孤独な存在として描かれています。しかし、現代において彼女たちは昔の面影を失っています。芸者（芸者、または舞妓）は、伝統的な日本の演芸技巧、音楽、歌、舞踊に熟練した女性のパフォーミングアーティストであり、高いホスピタリティと会話能力を持つ存在です。彼女たちの特徴的な外見は、長く優雅な着物と伝統的な髪型で際立っています。白いメイクと華やかな着物は、理想化された女性の美しさを象徴しています。
芸者は日本の豊かな文化遺産の視覚的な象徴であり、その芸術的な能力、優雅さ、品位で称賛されています。東方の江戸時代からの長い歴史を持つ彼女たちは、伝統文化の究極の象徴と見なされ続けています。彼女たちの装いは、色彩が一色で、簡潔な模様が下部に施されており、成熟を象徴しています。これらは公式な場で結婚女性が着るフォーマルな着物としての意味も持ちます。芸者は茶屋や宴会などの社交イベントでホステスとして働く専門の日本のエンターテイナーです。
彼女たちは日本の女性のエンパワーメントの象徴と見なされ、女性の解放の象徴でもあります。芸者としてのキャリアは、訓練と年功を象徴的に反映し、彼女たちの外見もその過程で変わっていきます。「芸者」という言葉は「芸の人」を意味し、彼女たちは高い職業的スキルを持つことが求められます。日本において、芸者は女性らしさと優雅さの象徴であり、特別でエリートな女性のグループを代表しています。
📹 Cultural Appropriation in Japan What Japanese People Really Think
Recently, there has been a slight controversy of whether or not Karlie Kloss has appropriated Japanese culture in her recent …
I dont blame you for making this article. But i think the reason japanese and asian minorites in the US get mad about this, is because other americans dont respect their culture. I cant tell you how many times ive been given gifts from korea or china because ive lived in Japan, and the attitude seems to be “whats the difference?”. Japanese, chinese, and korean fusion restuarants where the food is just mixed together is really not rare. So for a japanese minority whos been labeled as “asian” for their whole life, having white people go to Japan, and ask the average japanese person who has probably never lived outside the country about whether its racist or not is basically saying “see! Your people said its not racist! Stop complaining! ” Racism is something you cant understand untill youve experienced a bit of it yourself i think. I know i didnt before i came to Japan as a white male. I think Japanese people are generally more nice to foreigners as well. So i can only imagine Also i dont think the pictures here are racist. Just trying to imagine from that perspective
Telling Americans “Don’t wear kimono” is the same as telling Americans “Don’t eat sushi.” Japanese people don’t think it’s cultural appropriation at all. Cultural appropriation, which Japanese people are really angry with, is a Japanese restaurant run by Koreans and Chinese in the United States. They make Japanese food less valuable.There is no respect for Japanese food. The world misunderstands that Japanese food is not delicious. Offer unsanitary food by saying, “If you serve raw fish, it’s Japanese food.” I want only Japanese people or those who have trained correctly to cook Japanese food.
I’ve always been very confused about cultural appropriation and worried about offending someone. but I think appropriation and assimilation are often misused and are very different. appropriation depends on the context. if white women are being praised for wearing japanese traditional dress and are considered beautiful for it while japanese people arent, its cultural appropriation. the people interviewed here are native japanese so are they are a majority group, and dont exist in the context of American racial history and being a minority against white supremacy.
I actually think that the reason in oppinions between western people and Japanese people when ot comes to this boils down to the fact that Japanese people living in Japan have never had to experience rasism and microaggression on daily basis. Whereas for example Native Americans and African Americans have had to deal with White people belittleling their culture and customs. Then as soon as a white person does the thing they have shamed others for doing it becomes the new trend, or suddenly becomes OK because the person doing it is white. That is why people protest cultural appropriation for these cultures. But for Japanese people they have never been shamed for wearing their clothes or for their culture. So they don’t have any reason per say to hate the people that are taking their culture and “making it their own”. At least this is what I feel is the difference in cultural approppriation for these different cultures.
The sample population seems a bit skewed. They’re mainly in their late teens to mid-20s in Shibuya, Tokyo, where people tend to be more progressive than the rest of Japan. The response may differ if you ask someone from other geographic locations in Japan with different age groups. And Japanese tend to say what the interviewer wants to hear and not necessarily tell the truth in order to avoid ill feelings because, in this case, the model and the interviewer are of the same race. Although I think people here were mostly being honest, if you want to get the truth out of Japanese with a controversial issue, you have to let them be completely anonymous.
I have a story here So back in like 7 th grade Me and my Japanese friend wanted to wear matching kimonos and We were having fun but then people in my school called me horrible names, saying that I was disrespecting the Japanese culture and I meant no harm in doing that and I just wanted to show my appreciation because their culture is lovely and I wanted to help my friend honor her culture I have one question is it cultural appropriation for me as a white girl to wear a kimono to honor my friend and her culture ? Please let me know all of it is so confusing
I came to this article after perusal a debate over Bruno Mars “cultural appropriation”, wondering what that is. Cultural appropriation does not exist (problem of casting way too many white people exists though). Also, I have to note that this whole issue is the perception issue, people are seeing something that is actually not there. I understand that many many many people are underrepresented but that does not mean they specifically have the right to claim ownership of the culture. Many more roles should go to minority groups sure but that does not mean white people are somehow stealing culture.
I find “cultural appropriation” a stupid thing. Most of the times its more of an homage to the culture than an attempt to steal. The fact that some people get offended by it means they would be privatizing their culture, which is a terrible thing, since it promotes the non acceptance and tolerance between cultures and ultimately results in world division. An argument could be made saying that it might be stereotyping or disrespecting, but if thats the case its more racism than “cultural appropriation.
I’m also Japanese and I totally agree with these people. I think 99% of Japanese people won’t really care, or just think it’s a nice thing that someone is producing cool pictures with a Japanese culture taste. My understanding of “cultural appropriation” is that it’s more of an issue in the US tied closely with the history of racism and colonialism. Although Japan lost WW2 against the US and was occupied, I think we were never oppressed *culturally*, and I think that makes the entire idea of accusing someone for Japanese cultural appropriation impossible (or kind of stupid). Of course, we would be offended if they were mocking the Japanese traditions, but that actually has nothing to do with cultural appropriation. Just be respectful.
I’m glad Karlie apologized. This particular March, 2017 Vogue issue was about diversity and I assume through the phrase “diversity” they mean celebrating diversity. While Asian models are becoming more popular, our culture and Asian models in general are typically still used as a backdrop to European/European American models and in general, there is a lot of whitewashing when it comes to Asian representation in both fashion and films (more so films though). The only decent representation of Geiko/Maiko I’ve seen done in the western fashion world is Marie Claire Australia July, 2012 ( wandering-threads.com/2012/06/flower-willow-marie-claire-australia.html ). To talk about this editorial, we need to look at the team who put this together. The photographer was Mikael Jansson. The model was Karlie Kloss. Phllis Posnick did the styling while Julian Dy’s did the hair. And makeup was done by Hannah Murray. We also need to think about Vogue and who their audience is for this particular publication. As far as I can tell, this was for the US Vogue (the Vogue) and what was their theme? Diversity! How is any of that diverse except for romanticizing and appropriating culture and putting Japan as a backdrop? This would be a different conversation if a) this was coming from a Japanese company and Japanese directors and stylists and/or b) it was a Japanese model Not to mention that a lot of people are calling this ‘Geisha’ and none of it really implies anything Geiko/Maiko related.
The origin of the problem comes from the lack of representation. That’s why this is a problem. They could have hired a Japanese model or Japanese-American model. However, white faces still dominate the media; if you live in the states, just look around you, from billboards, to movies, to TV shows, to magazines, to ads, etc. While I have noticed an increase in diversity in the media, white faces still take the spotlight. When do you ever see the United States making movies with an all Asian cast? It took 25 years for that to happen when Crazy Rich Asians came out last summer. There hasn’t been any movies with representation since the Joy Luck Club. So in terms of the states representing equality these days, we’re far from it. How about the countless other groups of people in the states that haven’t been represented?
Alright everyone so listen Kevin can go outside in a kimono on Lunar New Year because one lunar New Year is not just for Asia and two he likes Japanese culture and he can go around wearing said so you don’t have the right or opinion to go up to him slap him across the face and say he’s a racist even though he bought the car from someone in Japan and you end up making him cry and want to go and eat in entire tub of Ben & Jerry’s
I’m South East Asian not Japanese, so I do not claim to be speaking for anyone, but I dislike the fact that there are some sexualised photos within the shoot, e.g. the bikini one and the one where it looks like she’s undressing (this one more so). It makes me feel like the culture/ethnic group is being fetishised.
Japanese do NOT mind cultural appropriation. In fact, the Japanese are in stead very thankful and are pleased. However…. They DO mind cultural “stealing,” meaning that by fabricating the history, you claim the origin of a particular culture. More specifically, the Japanese are angry about Koreans stealing the Japanese cultures. Koreans always ask to learn; change the techniques or contents a little; change the name; and then fabricate their history to claim the origin. Koreans are the only people in the world that does this. For instance, Brazilian learned Jujutsu from Japanese and developed Brazilian Jujutsu, or BJJ, that became so popular throughout the world. But they are no ashamed or hide the history. But Koreans learned Karate from the Japanese and changed its name and history to even claim the origin of Karate. They are doing the same thing with kendo, judo, aikido, samurai, ninja, katana, tea ceremony, food, fashion, pop cultures, paper, origami, ….. you name it. So I guess, for the Japanese, Cultural appropriation: NO, do not mind at all. Cultural stealing: YES, do mind and are in fact angry.
Wearing a kimono by Westerners is not a Cultural appropriation. However, Koreans wear kimonos, and the kimonos come from Korea! I think it’s Cultural appropriation when you start. Samsung, Hyundai, LG, etc. have advertised the cityscape of Tokyo, Mt. Fuji, kimono, Kyoto, and sumo as motifs. Obviously cultural appropriation. Especially Europeans buy it because they think Samsung is made in Japan.
While I understand how this could be viewed this way in Japan, I do not think your article accurately portrays the complexity of the issue in America and why it was perceived that way in the USA. It’s almost as if this was made to justify whitewashing, which has always been a huge problem for people of Asian descent. There’s a saying that says, lack of representation = misrepresentation. And even the limited amount of roles get whitewashed or bleached back in the USA. Not so in Japan. It’s different in that way. So to ask people if it’s offensive to simply see a caucasian girl dressed in Japanese attire isn’t REALLY why people are upset and it’s misleading.
People don’t realize that in Japan, they never had their culture stomped out by colonization. If you to countries that have you will see many are defensive. I mean I once watch a Koreans flip because they don’t like Japanese mimicking their culture and you be told about the Japanese invasion of Korea. It depends. In America, remember that white dominance has stomped out most and a lot of people don’t see it as fair.
Japan is a culture which takes in many other cultural ideas and tangibles, and calls it “Japanese.” Here is a list of things that actually aren’t Japanese in origin: Kimono, Sushi, Yaki Niku, Ramen, Japanese umbrellas, shabu shabu, Manga, anime, high speed trains, etc etc. I think Japan has a constant identity crisis. I cant go eat somewhere without being constantly reminded by every Japanese person that what I am eating is “TRADITIONAL, CULTURAL, and JAPANESE” Hamburg steak which is actually from Germany or England depending on who you ask.
JESUS CHRIST DIED ON THE CROSS FOR OUR SINS AND HE WAS BURIED AND HE ROSE AGAIN THE THIRD DAY ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES IF YOU HAVE FAITH WHICH MEANS YOU BELIEVE WITH ALL OF YOUR HEART IN THIS GOSPEL MESSAGE OF JESUS CHRIST WRITTEN AND FOUND IN THE BIBLE YOU SHALL BE SAVED AND GO TO HEAVEN IT IS WRITTEN AND FOUND IN THE BIBLE PLEASE READ AND SEE JOHN CHAPTER 3 VERSE 16 THROUGH 20 AS WELL AS HEBREWS CHAPTER 1 VERSE 1 THROUGH 10
Japanese people living in Japan since their birth do not have the same approach than the US or Western population considering racism and cultural appropriation. They did not suffer from colonization and slavery by white people, as other countries and population did. They cannot grasp the concept of “cultural appropriation”, it is not a thing for them, as they live in a country where there is only 1% of foreigners. I think it would be more interesting to ask japanese-american communities living in the US as a minority, and that might have suffer from white american oppression, racism and priviledge, ect what they think about those pictures… 🙂
I would like to see Japanese-Americans give their opinions. A lot of Japanese people don’t understand the racist culture in America and how Japanese people are portrayed and how it is damaging. To me this photo shoot is mostly harmless, but it’s another example of white women wearing Asian-inspired things instead of casting an actual Asian person to show the beauty of Asia.
This argument reminds me of bullying problems in Japan. Even though yahoos don’t mean to bully, just tease someone if the person feels being bullied that is “bullying” in Japan anyway. Applying this logic to cultural appropriation, it is not cultural appropriation as long as Japanese don’t feel it was disrespected. My personal opinion is that since Japan has been promoting its culture to the world, no logic to complain/blame when America or whoever adopt Japanese culture within their own media.